NewsBase - News, analysis and business intelligence from
emerging markets
Uphill struggle predicted for shale developments in China
By Ed Reed
North America’s shale gas revolution has triggered excitement around
the world from countries hoping to emulate this success story, with
China tipped as having even greater amounts of the resource. However,
the “perfect storm” of factors that drove development in the US and
Canada have not been seen anywhere else in the world and it is unlikely
that China will be able to make as rapid progress.
Beijing is going to have “some big challenges” replicating the
success seen in the US, Breitling Oil and Gas’ president and CEO, Chris
Faulkner, told ChinaOil by telephone last week. The company is
interested in working on projects in the country, from where Faulkner
was speaking.
“Do I think that [China’s] technically recoverable reserves are
bigger than the US’? Probably. Do I think [China is] going to have
anywhere near the success in the amount of time that [the US has] had?
Absolutely not,” he said, going on to point out a number of obstacles
that Beijing faces.
One of the challenges is that “most of the country’s key deposits
lie roughly 6,000 metres below the surface. That’s probably on average
two and a half to three times deeper than the deposits in the US.”
Assuming the need to drill another 2,500-3,000 metres horizontally,
the total measured depth for a well may be around 29,500 feet (9,000
metres). “The problem with that [depth] is that there are not very many
land-based rigs that can drill that deep.”
The cost of drilling a well this depth would be around US$30
million, or three times the price of such work in the US.
Assuming a rig would take four months to drill a 29,500-foot
(8,992-metre) well, it would only be capable of drilling three wells
per year. “Money’s no object for China but the problem is that the
scale is so big and [the Chinese are] trying to get where the US is in
a very short time.”
In addition to being at greater depths than in the US, the Chinese
shales are “not marine and so are very high in clay. This means they’re
not as brittle as the shales that we have in the US and so will be as
easy to fracture. How is the fracture going to take to the rock, how
does the rock respond – is it even going to respond?”
The logs that Faulkner has seen, he said, suggest the “geology isn’t
going to respond like it did in North America. There’s going to be a
big learning curve [in China].” Although the US is leading the world in
terms of shale developments, the industry is still at a very early
stage. For instance, Breitling is still adjusting each well drilled in
Texas’ Eagle Ford shale as it gathers more information.
American exceptionalism
The US approach to shale gas was possible because of the country’s
unique combination of factors. “We drill lots of holes in the ground
and there are lots of rigs running in the US,” the official said.
In order to sustain output in the face of high decline rates, as has
been seen in the US, firms must keep up a high pace of drilling. “In
the US, right now, to maintain output – not to increase it, not to
allow it to decrease – it takes about 900 rigs running continually to
keep the production flat.”
China “doesn’t have the technology, the horsepower or the key
personnel.”
Service companies will move to wherever the business is, Faulkner
said, but this will be driven by commercial reasoning. The rig builders
“don’t just put out unlimited horsepower, they don’t have the time to
do so, they’re building these rigs as fast as they can and they’re
going to put those rigs wherever the business is. Right now, that’s in
the US.”
The scale of competition in North America, both in terms of
operators and service companies, has been a key driver, Faulkner
continued. The region’s small independent companies are willing to take
risks and “go out there and discover these new basins and these new
technologies and this new way of doing things.”
On the other hand, firms working in China are required to form joint
ventures with local players, which serves as another limiting factor on
development. “[The joint venture requirement is] going to slow things
down tremendously.”
Another limit is the lack of midstream infrastructure. The US has an
extensive pipeline network – stemming from the country’s long history
of energy production.
Thus early production can be easily fed into nearby links, allowing
companies to save money rather than having to invest in the
construction of new lines.
Setting goals
The Breitling official was sceptical about the country’s ability to
meet its hoped-for shale gas output targets, much as its coal-bed
methane (CBM) targets have been missed. China set CBM goals but could
not meet them, Faulkner said, “and I think there are far more
challenges to shale than there were for CBM,” with the former resource
lying much deeper than the latter. In 2011, the country drilled only 50
shale wells, while there were “50 shale wells drilled last month in the
US.”
Beijing, in its 11th Five-Year Plan, set a production target of 177
billion cubic feet (5.01 billion cubic metres) from subsurface wells
for 2010. That target was missed, however, with subsurface output
standing at around 53 bcf (1.5 bcm).
Now China has set a goal of reaching 60-100 billion cubic metres per
year of shale gas production by 2020 but Faulkner predicted the country
was “at least a decade away” from significant production. “I think by
2025, China may achieve 30% of that number.”
In order to reach the desired production of 60 bcm per year,
Faulkner said – using the US as a model – China would need to drill
“5,000-10,000 wells – or maybe even more than 10,000. I don’t see that
happening in the next eight years.”
“Because of the decline curve of these wells, the initial production
figures will … come off a heavy slope, like a rollercoaster, so about
70% of the production is lost in the first three years and then it
levels out,” a problem common to shale wells. Therefore, more wells
must be drilled to compensate for the high decline curves.
China – and India – also faces the problem of water scarcity,
Faulkner said. “How are we going to use 4 million gallons [15 million
litres] of water to fracture a single well when [some people] don’t
even have access to clean water to drink? That’s a huge challenge.”
The Breitling official went on to note the Sichuan Basin had
substantial shale deposits, but that its population is large and water
was scarce. Propane can be used in fracking, instead of water, but this
is still in its early days of development.
Top tier
Faulkner picked out three countries, outside North America, as the
most appealing for new investments: Poland, the UK and China, in that
order. Poland “has the most to gain” from a new source of gas, while
the UK has “big promise.” China “definitely has the domestic market for
[shale gas development] but I think there are huge challenges.”
Overall, Faulkner took a cautious stance on the chances of
replicating the successes of the US in the rest of the world. “We’re
going to have to get better at [shale gas development] before it’s
really going to impact energy markets around the world.”